|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
My Perception Of Fish Health In The United
States
John A. Plumb
Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures, Auburn
University, Alabama 36849 Interest
in fish health thrived and grew in the United States during the last
century. During the first 60 years of
that period fish health was applied primarily to cultured fish intended for
stocking into waters on state and federal lands for sport fishing, but now it
is also extensively applied to commercial aquaculture. Fish health has influenced the growth of
commercial aquaculture in the United States in the last 40 years and around the
world. This has resulted in a greater
availability of training for fish health personnel, development of biologicals
and vaccines, and an emphasis on fish health management. Although state and federal agencies are
still extensively involved in research and diagnostic services, they no longer
dominate the field. Many individuals
that became involved in fish health began their careers in some area of
fisheries other than diseases (i.e. fish culture or fishery biology), but this
may not currently be the case. The
veterinary profession can contribute to aquatic animal health. As programs develop in schools of veterinary
medicine I encourage veterinarians to become knowledgeable in fish culture,
water quality, and fishery biology.
Aquatic animal health must be applied in a holistic management approach
to fisheries because it is not possible to know only the pathogen and/or the
fish, and still understand the complex relationship between the environment,
fish and pathogen. Advances in
biotechnology, such as molecular detection and identification of pathogens, and
development and application of vaccines for disease control have become
integral to fish health; however, biotechnology cannot alone solve all fish
disease problems.
Return to 28th Annual Eastern Fish Health WorkshopReturn to Leetown Science Center Home Page |